Conventional wisdom places communism on the extreme left of the
political spectrum and fascism on the far right, but is that really true?
I submit that it is not.
The mutual fanatical hatred and savagery toward each other
by the Nazis and the Soviets in World War II is usually pointed out as the
prime example of the opposing natures of the two systems. But this point of
view overlooks the fact that Hitler and Stalin were allies at the outbreak of
the war. Stalin watched with glee for years as Germany consumed much of Europe.
He even helped, invading Poland from the east shortly after Germany blitzed the
country from the west. Those arrangements were made between the two dictators before
the first panzer rolled. This mutual admiration society lasted until Adolf
screwed his neighbor to the east in 1941 via surprise invasion. Stalin was so
shocked by the betrayal of his ‘friend’ that it literally took him days to regain
his senses and put up a defense. Thus, the hatred toward the evil fascists was
born of betrayal and brutality more than from philosophical differences.
The similarities of communism and fascism are brought into
focus when we consider the life at the ground level of each government.
Both fascist and communist regimes have centrally planned
economies. Both control the internal movements of their people (papers,
please). Both spy on their own citizens. Both have secret police (Gestapo vs
KGB) to quell dissent. Both imprison or execute those who dare criticize the
regime. Both have government-controlled
healthcare. Both control the media. Both systems claim to promote ‘the greater
good for the greater number.’ Both populations live in perpetual fear.
I could go on, but you get the point.
Is life appreciably different for citizens living under
these supposedly opposite systems? If you found yourself in 1938 Berlin, would
your thank your lucky stars you weren’t living in Stalin’s Russia? Would the
opposite be true? The truth is, life under both states would be pretty similar.
In both systems, the rights of the individual are trampled
by the needs (or whims) of the all-powerful state. Additionally, said individual
has no recourse to correct harm to himself, his rights, or his property. He is
powerless to resist, thus the individual has no rights save those arbitrarily
granted by the State. It should be noted that what the State giveth, the State
also taketh away. As such, communism and fascism are merely different breeds of
the same animal. That animal is Statism, also known as collectivism.
When we adjust our view to see fascism and communism less as
opposing ideologies and more as estranged siblings, we see that they are just
two of the most recent forms of statism to join socialism, despotism, monarchy,
and others among the ranks of collectivist systems which crush the individual
under the weight of centralized governmental authority.
This is why The United States was designed to be a Republic
and not a democracy. Democracy may appear on the surface to be the best defense
against State tyranny. In reality, it is also a form of collectivism.
But that is for another post.
This false paradigm may also help explain why many people don't believe their vote matters. If your choices are between two flavors of the same tyranny, how could your vote matter?
Voters sense this false dichotomy at some level, though may not be able to put their finger on why it doesn't make sense. I was in that spot for a long time.
The popularity of candidates like Sanders and Trump demonstrate voters' desire to break free of 'the Establishment' by electing people they see as outsiders. But as long as we are still operating (and voting) under false assumptions, little will change aside from the natural growth of the State.
This false paradigm may also help explain why many people don't believe their vote matters. If your choices are between two flavors of the same tyranny, how could your vote matter?
Voters sense this false dichotomy at some level, though may not be able to put their finger on why it doesn't make sense. I was in that spot for a long time.
The popularity of candidates like Sanders and Trump demonstrate voters' desire to break free of 'the Establishment' by electing people they see as outsiders. But as long as we are still operating (and voting) under false assumptions, little will change aside from the natural growth of the State.
